閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
博洛尼亚进程后欧洲工程教育专业认证的发展研究———以欧洲工程教育认证网络为例
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | Research on Development of European Engineering Education Accreditation after Bologna Process : European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education as a Case |
作者 | 袁本涛、郑娟 |
中文摘要 | 博洛尼亚进程对欧洲高等工程教育专业认证产生了重要的影响,本文以欧洲工程教育认证网络(ENAEE)及欧洲工程教育专业认证(EUR-ACE)体系的出现和发展为切入点,分析了其历史、背景、组织结构、认证标准,及其与欧洲各国工程教育专业认证之间的关系,并将EUR-ACE认证体系与华盛顿协议进行了比较,发现EUR-ACE体系在欧洲层面建立起了一种分散式的第一阶段和第二阶段统一的认证体系。EUR-ACE体系既强调灵活性和兼容性,又努力保证各国的多样性。 |
英文摘要 | The Bologna Process has exerted a great impact on European higher engineering education accreditation. Beginning with the emergence and development of the European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education (ENAEE) and its European Accreditation of Engineering Programme (EUR-ACE ® ),this paper researches their histories,backgrounds,structures and accreditation standards ,as well as the relationship between the EUR一ACE ® and its member organizations. Furthermore, a comparison with the Washington Agreement shows that EUR一ACE ® is a European-level decentralized accreditation system that integrates the first cycle and the second cycle and delegates authority to national accreditation organizations. The system has both flexibility and compatibility, and strives to ensure diversity of accreditation across the countries. |
起訖頁 | 028-033 |
關鍵詞 | 欧洲工程教育认证网络、博洛尼亚进程、工程教育专业认证、European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education、Bologna process、engineering education accreditation |
刊名 | 清華大學教育研究 |
期數 | 201502 (36:1期) |
出版單位 | 清華大學 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 决策是如何做出的?———关于英国米德尔塞斯大学关闭哲学系的案例研究 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 学术竞争的风险:过去与现在 |