國中自然與生活科技教師對部編本教科書之滿意度調查研究

A Survey of Junior High School Science and Technology Teachers’ Satisfaction with Textbooks Issued by the Ministry of Education

教育部在2005 年出版國中自然與生活科技部編本教科書「編撰架構」及「第一冊」，本研究旨在瞭解使用者國中自然與生活科技教師對該兩文件的滿意度，供後續部編本編印和選用之參考。研究對象以選用部編本教科書的56 所學校進行問卷調查，回收有效問卷128份（回收率69.6%）。調查結果顯示：（1）教師對部編本教科書的滿意度不因性別、學歷、任教科別與年資不同而有所差異，故後續得以整體教師意見討論；（2）教師對部編本教科書的「編撰架構」及第一冊之「內容屬性」、「教學屬性」和「可讀性」滿意度中等；（3）教師對部編本教科書第一冊之「物理屬性」具有較高的滿意度；（4）部編本教科書的編撰架構需更妥善規劃適切的學習內容與學習順序；（5）部編本教科書的內容應加強理念統整及內容的完整性、邏輯性與生活化；（6）部編本教科書應更妥善規劃適切的教學目標、活動示例、評量方式及輔助教材；（7）部編本教科書的內容須更妥善規劃圖文與字體規格的妥適性、標題的趣味性及文句使用的適當性。

The objectives of this study were to investigate junior high school scienceand technology (S&T) teachers’ satisfaction levels in regard to the frameworkand content of volume one of the national S&T textbook for junior highschool students and to examine differences based on demographic variables ofthe teachers. To achieve these objectives, a questionnaire with 184 items wasmailed to all 56 junior high schools that selected the national S&T textbook.The following conclusions were made based on the survey results: (1) Thegender, major, teaching experience, and educational background of teachersdid not affect their satisfaction with the national textbook; (2) Teachers weremoderately satisfied with the “framework,” “content attributes,” “teaching attributes”and “readability” of the national textbook; (3) Teachers tended to bemore satisfied with the “physical attributes” of the national textbook; (4) Theframework of the national textbook needs to better planned to provide moreappropriate learning content and order; (5) The content of the national textbookcould be improved by enhancing the integration of rationale, and thecompleteness, logicality, and relation to life of content; (6) The national textbookcould be improved by planning instructional goals, learning activities,evaluations, and auxiliary learning materials; (7) The content of the nationaltextbook could be improved with more appropriate illustrations, characters,fonts, interesting headings, and appropriate sentence structure.