大學教師評鑑制度之後設評鑑研究--以國立屏東教育大學為例

A Study on the Meta-Evaluation of the Faculty Evaluation System in National Pingtung University of Education

本研究旨在探討國立屏東教育大學教師評鑑制度的後設評鑑，透過評鑑的評鑑，分析本校教師評鑑制度的適當性與缺失。本研究透過問卷調查方式，瞭解受評教師、評鑑委員以及評鑑規劃與執行單位對學校教師評鑑制度的看法，根據研究結果分析，歸納結論並據以提出具體建議，做為日後改進的參考。\r本研究應用適切性、效用性、可行性及精確性等四個標準為評鑑規準。在「適切性標準」整體層面表現良好，顯示本校教師評鑑能夠在合法且合乎倫理的情形下實施，並能關注受評對象與評鑑相關人員之福祉；在「效用性標準」整體層面，尚能發揮其效用，但在評鑑結果的應用及後續輔導措施表現不佳；在「可行性標準」整體層面表現良好，顯示本校教師評鑑制度易於實施且具可行性，但在提供人力、財物與時間資源上還有努力的空間；在「精確性標準」整體層面表現尚可，但在具辨明性及有信度的資訊上表現平平。在各題項表現上，計有九題未通過。

The purpose of this study is to explore the meta-evaluation of the faculty evaluation system of National Pingtung University of Education， and through the evaluation， find out the advantages and defects about the system. In this study， we collect the opinion on the evaluation system from those evaluated teachers， evaluators， and the evaluation planning and implementation departments with questionnaires， analyze it， and get the conclusion. And at the last， we present the concrete suggestions accordingly for the future improvement.In this study， four standards， propriety， utility， feasibility， and accuracy are applied as the evaluation criterion. With propriety standards， the evaluation can be implemented legally and ethically， and the benefits of all the stakeholders will be considered. With utility standards， the system works acceptably. But the application of the evaluation results and the subsequent consulting measures do not work well. With feasibility standards， the system works well. That is， it is feasible and can be performed easily. But the availability of time， human resource， and funds is not enough. And it is also politically feasible. With accuracy standards， the system works acceptably.