學校人員應瞭解的通報制度與違法責任相關問題之探討,ERICDATA高等教育知識庫
高等教育出版
熱門: 崔雪娟  黃光男  朱丽彬  王善边  王美玲  黃乃熒  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   大陸/海外期刊   政府機關   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文   購買本期
篇名
學校人員應瞭解的通報制度與違法責任相關問題之探討   免費試閱
並列篇名
Studies on Reporting Requirements and Violating Disposition of which School Personnel Should Be Aware
作者 郭慧龍
中文摘要
我國現行要求教育人員通報的法規繁多,本文整理並加以分析後,獲得下結論與建議:
一、學校通報事項繁多,教育主管機關宜與各主管機關橫向整合,彙編法規及通報之標準作業流程,並廣為宣導。二、各項法規中對規範對象的敘述未能窮盡學校場域中所有人員,且各項法規中的規範對象未盡一致。未來仍須再予修訂相關法規,以落實通報。三、對具有通報義務的人員類別定義宜採立法解釋。四、學校對適用《勞動基準法》之通報義務人員,應將通報義務納入工友工作規則及勞動契約。五、學校應明確訂定通報權責,以防制校園性侵害、性騷擾或性霸凌及校園霸凌事件。六、加強宣導通報義務與各法規之罰則,期通報義務人員了解不同性質之處罰可併罰之法理。七、現行法規對某些具通報義務者無法處罰,亟待修訂法規以填補法律漏洞。八、懲處先於懲戒時,懲處失效時點仍待有關機關(公懲會、行政法院、保訓會)形成共識。
英文摘要
Current reporting requirements in the country for school personnel are intricate and complicated. After collecting and analyzing related regulations, this study has the following conclusions and recommendations. 1. Terms and requirements that command school reporting are abundant and cumbersome. Ministry of Education should integrate with other Ministries to compile and promote the standard reporting procedure. 2. Not all school employees are included in the regulations, neither were varies regulations consistent on the definition of personnel regulated. Amendments will need to be made in the future to insure indeed reporting. 3. Personnel obligated to the reporting protocol should be defined with statutory interpretation. 4. Employment agreement should explicitly states the reporting obligation for those employees qualified under Labor Standards Act.5. School should clearly define reporting responsibility to prevent sexually related assault, harassment and bullying, as well as general bullying incidents. 6. Improve working education and help employee understand varies regulations and the corresponding penalties that may be applied in conjunction. 7. Penalties for some who violate the reporting obligation are currently without recourse, which is a legal loophole that will need to be filled.8. If the punishment disposition happens before the disciplinary disposition, then when is the timing on which the punishment disposition lost its effect? The Public Functionary Disciplinary Sanction Commission, The Administrative Court, and The Civil Service Protection and Training Commission will have to reach consensus on the timing.
起訖頁 160-206
關鍵詞 通報義務規範對象一事不二罰The Reporting ObligationRegulated PersonnelNo Double Jeopardy
刊名 學校行政  
期數 201311 (88期)
出版單位 社團法人中華民國學校行政研究學會
DOI 10.3966/160683002013110088009   複製DOI
QR Code
該期刊
上一篇
新北市國小多元活化課程及其政策轉型決定模式之探討
該期刊
下一篇
校務評鑑人員認證的阻礙與因應

高等教育知識庫  閱讀計畫  教育研究月刊  新書優惠  

教師服務
合作出版
期刊徵稿
聯絡高教
高教FB
讀者服務
圖書目錄
教育期刊
訂購服務
活動訊息
數位服務
高等教育知識庫
國際資料庫收錄
投審稿系統
DOI註冊
線上購買
高點網路書店 
元照網路書店
博客來網路書店
教育資源
教育網站
國際教育網站
關於高教
高教簡介
出版授權
合作單位
知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達
版權所有‧轉載必究 Copyright2011 高等教育文化事業股份有限公司  All Rights Reserved
服務信箱:edubook@edubook.com.tw 台北市館前路 26 號 6 樓 Tel:+886-2-23885899 Fax:+886-2-23892500